An English In Kentucky



















April 19th 2009

    The natural condition is behind us.  Whether or not it was golden, to the extent that we have fallen, remains a preoccupation in heroic minds.  This question is as old as written record.  From Gilgamesh to spacemen.  Plato to Sartre and who knows what is currently mumbled in the halls of thinking.  

    But I do not think the ancestors asked the golden question until a long time had passed.  Not because they were harmonious beneficiaries of the natural condition, but because the question had no usefulness.  Certainly memory would have contained the qualities of yesterday, and the mind searches for a potential quality in tomorrow.  Then through language and an ability to share idea, the perfect time would have emerged as a usefulness in an increasing complexity.  A circle, from perfect back to perfect.

    It is, I suggest, out of "time as quality" that questions emerge.  So if you are eccentric in your beliefs, and here I share the eccentricity, time is a material element of being a living thing.



    Like the ancestors I do not find myself in a position of apoplexy over the "question why", unless it pertains to an immediate issue.  I manage to get out of bed in the morning, whether God exists or not.  Then if the cat is missing I might ask the "question why".

    And here, I have a question that might clarify my position.  "Why do people believe in anything?"   The answer generally is hedged by definitions.  "Define belief?"  Is it an idea, or is it a thing. 

    Some will see it is a quality of awareness.  For me this makes it both an idea and a thing, because awareness is a thing that makes things.  People are things that make and are able to share things.  What we share is sometimes unattractive and sometimes useful.     

Previous  Next

 (William James) (Lightning) (Chameleon) (Chameleon) (Chameleon color) (Chameleon color)